Dr. Fuhr’s Commentary

This is now the fourth clinical trial published since 1996 comparing Activator-assisted manipulation to manual thrust manipulation for neck pain. Overall, it is a well designed study. However, the results are inconsistent with the findings from three previous clinical trials which reported that manual-thrust manipulation and Activator-assisted manipulation were equally effective in the treatment of neck pain.

Strengths: All instrument-assisted manipulations were administered using a single thrust with an Activator IV instrument on a setting of “2” with the manipulative force delivered to the pedicle-lamina junction of the involved segment in an anterior, superior, and slightly medial line of drive. Furthermore, the manipulations were administered by a practitioner with 29 years of clinical experience in instrument manipulation.

Weaknesses: In this trial, the instrument was used only as a biomechanical device, and no Activator Method analytical protocols were used. The choice of which level of the cervical spine to address was at the discretion of the clinician following static palpation. Also, each type of treatment was delivered by a single clinician, and it is possible that part of the treatment response was due to indirect contextual factors related to participant-provider interaction, rather than the direct effect of the treatment alone.

Bottom Line: The results are not definitive, and further research investigating the differences from previous trials is warranted, but overall I applaud the efforts of my Australian research colleagues.

Dr. Arlan W. Fuhr

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 2 different cervical manipulation techniques for mechanical neck pain (MNP).

METHODS:

Participants with MNP of at least 1 month’s duration (n = 65) were randomly allocated to 3 groups: (1) stretching (control), (2) stretching plus manually applied manipulation (MAM), and (3) stretching plus instrument-applied manipulation (IAM). MAM consisted of a single high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical chiropractic manipulation, whereas IAM involved the application of a single cervical manipulation using an (Activator IV) adjusting instrument. Preintervention and postintervention measurements were taken of all outcomes measures. Pain was the primary outcome and was measured using visual analogue scale and pressure pain thresholds. Secondary outcomes included cervical range of motion, hand grip-strength, and wrist blood pressure. Follow-up subjective pain scores were obtained via telephone text message 7 days postintervention.

RESULTS:

Subjective pain scores decreased at 7-day follow-up in the MAM group compared with control (P = .015). Cervical rotation bilaterally (ipsilateral: P = .002; contralateral: P = .015) and lateral flexion on the contralateral side to manipulation (P = .001) increased following MAM. Hand grip-strength on the contralateral side to manipulation (P = .013) increased following IAM. No moderate or severe adverse events were reported. Mild adverse events were reported on 6 occasions (control, 4; MAM, 1; IAM, 1).

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrates that a single cervical manipulation is capable of producing immediate and short-term benefits for MNP. The study also demonstrates that not all manipulative techniques have the same effect and that the differences may be mediated by neurological or biomechanical factors inherent to each technique.


J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jun;39(5):319-29. [PMID: 27180949]

Author information: Gorrell LM, Beath K, Engel RM.  Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.


Full Text Article

More in this category: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Effects of Applying a Force to C5 by a Mechanically Assisted Instrument (MAI) on Referred Pain to the Shoulder » Glucose Metabolic Changes in the Brain and Muscles of Patients with Nonspecific Neck Pain Treated by Spinal Manipulation Therapy: A [18F]FDG PET Study » Manual and Instrument Applied Cervical Manipulation for Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. » Clinical Trials » Attenuation Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Neuropathic and Postoperative Pain Through Activating Endogenous Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Interleukin 10 in Rat Spinal Cord » Comparing Outcome Measures in Lumbar Spine Manipulations: Dynamic X-Rays and Oswestry Index » Resolution of Cervicalgia, Paraesthesia and Chronic Adhesive Capsulitis in a 67-Year-Old Male: A Case Study » A Randomized Controlled Trial to Measure the Effects of Specific Thoracic Chiropractic Adjustments on Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate » Neural Response During a Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model: A Pilot Study » Comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. » In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Single Impulse and Repetitive Mechanical Shockwave Devices Utilized for Spinal Manipulative Therapy » A pilot study of a chiropractic intervention for management of chronic myofascial temporomandibular disorder. » Comparison of paraspinal cutaneous temperature measurements between subjects with and without chronic low back pain. » Changes in pressure pain thresholds and Basal electromyographic activity after instrument-assisted spinal manipulative therapy in asymptomatic participants: a randomized, controlled trial. » Clinical effectiveness of the Activator adjusting instrument in the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. » Evaluation of Mechanical Allodynia in an Animal Immobilization Model using the Von Frey Method » Measuring the Effects of Specific Cervical Chiropractic Adjustments on Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate: A Randomized Controlled Trial » Inflammatory response following a short-term course of chiropractic treatment in subjects with and without chronic low back pain. » Relative effectiveness and adverse effects of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain: results from a stopped randomised trial. » Mechanical vs manual manipulation for low back pain: an observational cohort study. » Resolution of Breech Presentation Using an Activator Adjusting Instrument to Administer Webster’s Technique in Three Women Undergoing Chiropractic Care » Heart Rate Variability Modulation After Manipulation in Pain-Free Patients vs Patients in Pain » Relative Immediate Effect of Ischaemic Compression and Activator Trigger Point Therapy on Active Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: A Randomized Trial » Effects of a Manually Assisted Mechanical Force on Cutaneous Temperature » Immediate effect of activator trigger point therapy and myofascial band therapy on non-specific neck pain in patients with upper trapezius trigger points compared to sham ultrasound: A randomised controlled trial. » Variability of Force Magnitude and Force Duration in Manual and Instrument-Based Manipulation Techniques » Three-Dimensional Vertebral Motions Produced by Mechanical Force Spinal Manipulation » A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Relative Effectiveness of Manual Versus Mechanical Force Chiropractic Adjustments in the Management of Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome » Chiropractic Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders Using the Activator Adjusting Instrument: A Prospective Case Series » Lateral Cervical Curve Changes in Patients Receiving Chiropractic Care After A Motor Vehicle Collision: A Retrospective Case Series » Chiropractic Treatment of Postsurgical Neck Syndrome With Mechanical Force, Manually Assisted Short-Lever Spinal Adjustments » A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial on the Relative Effect of Instrumental Versus Manual Thrust Manipulation in the Treatment of Cervical Spine Dysfunction. » Treatment of Cervical Disc Protrusions Via Instrumental Chiropractic Adjustment. » Safety in chiropractic practice. Part II: Treatment to the upper neck and the rate of cerebrovascular incidents. » The effects of spinal manipulation on the intensity of emotional arousal in phobic subjects exposed to a threat stimulus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. » Letters to the Editor | Safety in chiropractic practice. Part II: Treatment to the upper neck and the rate of cerebrovascular incidents. » Comparison of Two Chiropractic Techniques on Pain and Lateral Flexion in Neck Pain Patients: a Pilot Study » Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. » Three-Dimensional Head Kinematics and Cervical Range of Motion in the Diagnosis of Patients with Neck Trauma. » The Immediate Effect of Activator vs. Meric Adjustment on Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial » Instantaneous Helical Axis Estimation From 3-D Video Data in Neck Kinematics for Whiplash Diagnostics. » Biomechanical Characterization (fingerprinting) of Five Novel Methods of Cervical Spine Manipulation » Three-Dimensional Head Axis of Rotation During Tracking Movements: A Tool for Assessing Neck Neuromechanical Function » Treatment and biomechanical assessment of patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome. » Three-dimensional Head Kinematics and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Neck Injury Treated with Spinal Manipulative Therapy: a Pilot Study » Cervical spine: manipulative skill and performance considerations » Spinal learning: central modulation of pain processing and long-term alteration of interneuronal excitability as a result of nociceptive peripheral input. » Interexaminer Reliability of an Isolation Test for the Identification of Upper Cervical Subluxation » Effects of Chiropractic Treatment on Blood Pressure and Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial » Reliability of the Derifield-Thompson test for leg length inequality, and use of the test to demonstrate cervical adjusting efficacy. »
Previous Post Improvement in Chronic Musculoskeletal Arm Pain and Headaches in an 89- Year-Old Male Receiving Chiropractic Care Involving Torque Release Technique and Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique: A Case Report.
Next Post Manual and Instrument Applied Cervical Manipulation for Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.