Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the validity and reliability of prone and supine measurements of leg length inequality and to determine the potential use of measurements at the iliac crests and patient demographics as predictors to estimate standing leg length differential.

DESIGN:

Repeated prone and supine measurements of leg length inequality were made by an experienced chiropractor and compared with iliac crest and femur head measurements made on X-rays of standing patients. Multiple regression analysis was performed.

SETTING:

Private chiropractic practice.

PARTICIPANTS:

The first 50 new patients with low back pain that were X-rayed were included in the study.

RESULTS:

Intraexaminer reliability was excellent for the prone measurements. The supine tests were less reliable. The prone measurements were highly correlated with the standing X-ray femur head measurement. The supine measurements were poorly correlated. Measurements of deficiency at the iliac crests on X-ray were most highly correlated with X-ray measurements of discrepancy. In multiple regression, the prone measurements and duration of problem were the only significant predictors of standing X-ray difference.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, crest measurements were made on X-ray; the degree of accuracy with which millimeter differences can be measured clinically on patients is unknown. In a few cases, the supine measurements were more accurate than the prone; however, the supine test validity was poor when compared with the standing X-ray measurements, and reliability was less than expected. Supine measurements should not be used to estimate standing leg length discrepancy in new low back pain patients but perhaps can be used in other clinically meaningful ways. Intraexaminer reliability of the prone measurements was higher, but further investigations need to focus on interexaminer reliability. The prone measurement as a predictor holds promise, but new measurement tools must be developed.


J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Sep;18(7):448-52. [PMID:8568426]

Author information: Rhodes DW, Mansfield ER, Bishop PA, Smith JF. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL,USA.

More in this category: Comparing Outcome Measures in Lumbar Spine Manipulations: Dynamic X-Rays and Oswestry Index » The Chiropractic Report – May 2014 » Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation. » Interexaminer Reliability of Supine Leg Checks for Discriminating Leg-Length Inequality » The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature. » Interexaminer Reliability of a Leg Length Analysis Procedure Among Novice and Experienced Practitioners » Interexaminer Reliability of the Prone Leg Length Analysis Procedure » Comparison of Dynamic Posteroanterior Spinal Stiffness to Plain Film Radiographic Images of Lumbar Disk Height » Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness of the Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique Leg Check Based on Interexaminer Reliability » Interexaminer Reliability of Activator Method’s Relative Leg-Length Evaluation in the Prone Extended Position » Measurement of Soft Tissue Strain in Response to Consecutively Increased Compressive and Distractive Loads on a Friction-Based Test Bed » Back to Basics…Technology Assessment of the Chiropractic Subluxation » Leg Length Inequality and the Side of Low Back Pain – A Pilot Study » Optoelectric Measurement of Changes in Leg Length Inequality Resulting from Isolation Tests » Optoelectric Measurement of Leg Length Inequalities Before, During, and After Isolation Tests. » Optoelectric Measurement of Leg Length Changes During Isolation Tests » Responsiveness of leg alignment changes associated with articular pressure testing to spinal manipulation: the use of a randomized clinical trial design to evaluate a diagnostic test with a dichotomous outcome. » Reactivity of Leg Alignment to Articular Pressure Testing: Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test using a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Approach » Motion Analysis as a Means to Objectify Changes in Apparent (Prone) Leg Length Inequality » Interexaminer Reliability of Eight Evaluative Dimensions of Lumbar Segmental Abnormality » Precise measurement of functional leg length inequality and changes due to cervical spine rotation in pain-free students. » Interexaminer Reliability of Relative Leg Length Evaluations in the Prone Extended Position » Reliability of the Derifield-Thompson test for leg length inequality, and use of the test to demonstrate cervical adjusting efficacy. » Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of leg-length differential measurement: a preliminary study. »
Previous Post The Immediate Effect of Activator vs. Meric Adjustment on Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Next Post A Biomechanical Model of the Lumbar Spine During Upright Isometric, Flexion, Extension, and Lateral Bending