A study was undertaken to assess the stability of leg alignment reaction to a pressure challenge and its responsiveness to an adjustive intervention.


Prospective, double-blind clinical trial of a diagnostic test.


Laboratory: Center for Technique Research.


Forty-two chiropractic college students, faculty and staff.


A high-velocity, low-amplitude, short lever adjustment of a single vertebra from among C1 and T3-T7; or a sham adjustment similar to a manual diagnostic pressure test at C1, T3-T7 or T9-T10.


Leg alignment reactivity: An increase in leg alignment discrepancy (yes or no) following a metered pressure challenge to a vertebra.


On average, stability was poor at T3-T7 (Kappa = 0.04), moderate at C1 (K = 0.47), and fair for sham pressure tests (K = 0.30). Responsiveness: The proportion of positive baseline leg alignment reactions that responded (became negative) to sham adjustment was 95% at T3-T7 and 55% at C1. Further analysis was untenable since too few vertebrae were implicated for an adjustment.


For the population investigated, the majority of the responsiveness of the leg alignment diagnostic test to a rotatory adjustment appears to be a diagnostic illusion (i.e., background noise unrelated to a treatment intervention). Further research with different subject populations, regions of investigation, leg alignment measurement techniques and vertebral challenge techniques are indicated.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Jun;16(5):306-11. [PMID:8345313]

Author information: Haas M, Peterson D, Rothman EH, Panzer D, Krein R, Johansen R, Solomon S. Research Department, Western States Chiropractic College, Portland, OR 97230.

Previous Post Reactivity of Leg Alignment to Articular Pressure Testing: Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test using a Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Approach
Next Post Optoelectric Measurement of Leg Length Changes During Isolation Tests