Abstract

STUDY DESIGN:

Comparative study using robotic replication of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) vertebral kinematics together with serial dissection.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to quantify loads created in cadaveric spinal tissues arising from three different forms of SMT application.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:

There exist many distinct methods by which to apply SMT. It is not known presently whether different forms of SMT application have different effects on spinal tissues. Should the method of SMT application modulate spinal tissue loading, quantifying this relation may help explain the varied outcomes of SMT in terms of effect and safety.

METHODS:

SMT was applied to the third lumbar vertebra in 12 porcine cadavers using three SMT techniques: a clinical device that applies forces through a hand-held instrument (INST), a manual technique of applying SMT clinically (MAN) and a research device that applies parameters of manual SMT through a servo-controlled linear actuator motor (SERVO). The resulting kinematics from each SMT application were tracked optically via indwelling bone pins. The L3/L4 segment was then removed, mounted in a parallel robot and the resulting kinematics from SMT replayed for each SMT application technique. Serial dissection of spinal structures was conducted to quantify loading characteristics of discrete spinal tissues.

RESULTS:

In terms of load magnitude, SMT application with MAN and SERVO created greater forces than INST in all conditions (P < 0.05). Additionally, MAN and SERVO created comparable posterior forces in the intact specimen, but MAN created greater posterior forces on IVD structures compared to SERVO (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Specific methods of SMT application create unique vertebral loading characteristics, which may help explain the varied outcomes of SMT in terms of effect and safety.


Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):635-643. PMID: 28146021 

Author information: Funabashi M, Nougarou F, Descarreaux M, Prasad N, Kawchuk GN. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.


Full Text Article

More in this category: Resolution of Lower Limb Sensory Polyneuropathy In A 63-Year-Old Male Receiving Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique For The Correction Of Vertebral Subluxation » Impact of Chiropractic Manipulation on Bone and Skeletal Muscle of Ovariectomized Rats » Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report » Glucose Metabolic Changes in the Brain and Muscles of Patients with Nonspecific Neck Pain Treated by Spinal Manipulation Therapy: A [18F]FDG PET Study » Attenuation Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Neuropathic and Postoperative Pain Through Activating Endogenous Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Interleukin 10 in Rat Spinal Cord » Neural Response During a Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model: A Pilot Study » In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Single Impulse and Repetitive Mechanical Shockwave Devices Utilized for Spinal Manipulative Therapy » Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters. » Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high velocity low amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement. » Changes in pressure pain thresholds and Basal electromyographic activity after instrument-assisted spinal manipulative therapy in asymptomatic participants: a randomized, controlled trial. » Evaluation of Mechanical Allodynia in an Animal Immobilization Model using the Von Frey Method » Cerebral Metabolic Changes in Men After Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation for Neck Pain » Immediate Effects of the Audible Pop from a Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation on the Autonomic Nervous System and Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial » Inflammatory response following a short-term course of chiropractic treatment in subjects with and without chronic low back pain. » Heart Rate Variability Modulation After Manipulation in Pain-Free Patients vs Patients in Pain » Effects of a Manually Assisted Mechanical Force on Cutaneous Temperature » Three-Dimensional Vertebral Motions Produced by Mechanical Force Spinal Manipulation » Spinal Manipulation Reduces Pain and Hyperalgesia after Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Inflammation in the Rat » Active Trunk Extensor Contributions to Dynamic Posteroanterior Lumbar Spinal Stiffness » Neuromechanical Characterization of in Vivo Lumbar Spinal Manipulation. Part II. Neurophysiological Response » Neuromechanical Characterization of In Vivo Lumbar Spinal Manipulation. Part I. Vertebral Motion » Stiffness and Neuromuscular Reflex Response of the Human Spine to Posteroanterior Manipulative Thrusts In Patients With Low Back Pain » Muscular and Soft-Tissue Contributions of Dynamic Posteroanterior Spinal Stiffness » Lumbar Erector Spinae Reflex Responses to Mechanical Force, Manually- Assisted Thoracolumbar and Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation in Patients with Low Back Pain » Neurophysiological Response to Intraoperative Lumbosacral Spinal Manipulation » Electromyographic Responses To Mechanical Force, Manually Assisted Spinal Manipulative Therapy » Mechanical Force Spinal Manipulation Increases Trunk Muscle Strength Assessed By Electromyography: A Comparative Controlled Clinical Trial » Reflex Responses Associated with Activator Treatment » Letters to the Editor | Safety in chiropractic practice. Part II: Treatment to the upper neck and the rate of cerebrovascular incidents. » Relationship between Preload and Peak Forces during Spinal Manipulative Treatments » Spinal learning: central modulation of pain processing and long-term alteration of interneuronal excitability as a result of nociceptive peripheral input. » Effects of altered afferent articular input on sensation, proprioception, muscle tone and sympathetic reflex responses. »
Previous Post Patient Perceived Effectiveness of a Course of Chiropractic Care in a Teaching Clinic Following Initial Exposure to Chiropractic Through a Public Spinal Screening
Next Post The Activator Advantage - May 2017