Activator Methods -- Chiropractic, Seminars, Spinal Specialist

Activator Methods International Ltd.
2950 N. Seventh Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85014

ofc 602-224-0220
fax 602-224-0230
toll free 1-800-598-0224

Research Information : Cervical Spine Related Studies : Research Article

Subject: Leg Length Inequality, Assessment, X-Ray Analysis

Title: The Validity of the Prone Leg Check as an Estimate of Standing Length Inequality Measured by X-ray.

Reference: Rhodes DW, Mansfield ER, Bishop PA, Smith JF. The Validity of the Prone Leg Check as an Estimate of Standing Length Inequality Measured by X-ray. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995; 18:343-6

Abstract: Objective: To determine if prone leg length measurements for inequality are valid to estimate standing X-ray measured differences.

Design: Leg length inequality (LLI) was measured, in millimeters, with patient prone and with a standing X-ray, by an experienced chiropractor. Correlation between the two was calculated, and dependent t test performed.

Setting: Private chiropractic practice.

Participants: The first 50 new patients with low back pain (LBP) who were X-rayed were included in the study.

Results: Correlation between the two variables was ).71. Standard error estimation was 5.4mm. In 5.4% of subjects, the prone measurement was within 3mm of the X-ray LLI; in 12%, however, opposite legs identified as being "shorter" between the two methods. In 76% of patients, prone measurements were within 6mm of X-ray, but there was 12-mm difference between the two measurements methods in 8% of the comparisons.

Conclusions: Despite positive correlation, prone leg length measurements for inequality are not entirely valid estimates of standing X-ray differences. Large differences between prone and X-ray measurements in some cases indicate that one should be cautious when using the prone method alone to estimate leg length discrepancy. Additional research is needed to determine the causes of measurement differences between the two methods. Other methods for estimating standing leg length differential must be developed and evaluated for validity.